Wednesday, December 12, 2012

No Choice for the Worker, Student and Life


The Liberal idea of Choice in regards to the Citizen is not about the one, but the many.....



Choice is a word replete with different meanings for different people.  I continue to study the “Liberal” party consisting of Progressive left wing Collectivists and come to realize I just cannot get a grip on their meaning of choice.

We know, from recent legislation and protests that the worker should not have any choice when they attempt to get a job in a union state, non-Right to work.  It appears from the hate filled protests, the teachers calling in sick and the violence that go with this crowd of Pro-Union folk that the worker should be forced to pay dues to a union if they want to work.  What kind of a “choice” is that?  If you want a job you have to pay off the Union in order to get it?  Where does this not smack of corruption and graft?  This is like paying the local mob for “protection” from those bad guys that haunt a neighborhood at night; mostly the “mob” goons.  Further, this reeks of monopoly; a job monopoly.  Unions tend to have a job monopoly in a given sector.  They control the hours, the labor, the jobs and the ability for someone to get hired and for this control; the worker must pay a fee or a bribe if you will.  It seems these Unions are so great that they need laws to force the members to pay them dues.  That is right, you heard it here; the worker must pay the Union for the privilege of ……..working.

But my confusion only begins with the Union; it actually gets amplified when we go to public schools.  This same group of Liberals does not believe in school choice.  They again must protect their turf, read money and jobs, at the cost of education.  A poor family or single parent living in a less than stellar neighborhood cannot have a choice as to where to send their children.  The Union of Liberals demands that this family and their children must continue to suffer and must not be allowed to choose a better school or a better life.  That is not choice; that is a lack of choice.  That is slavery and punishment to a group more interested in power and votes.  Why can’t the citizen be allowed to choose a better Life?  I thought we were born with unalienable rights with which we could pursue Life, Liberty and Happiness as we see fit.  Why does this Liberal party demand we live within their monopoly of power?

These two monopolies on choice only seek to bring in to perspective the complete hypocrisy of choice when it comes to the fetus.  The worker should not have a choice when it comes to having a job, the student should not have a choice when it comes to education but when it comes to Life we must grant women the ability to kill their babies.  And we are not talking about the right of choice when it comes to rape or incest or medical issues; the Liberal wants to be able to choose at any time the right to kill a living being regardless.  Where is the consistency?  I think I have found it in the end.

The Liberal Progressive wants choice when it comes to the Collective; the group that is holds within its monopoly on Life.  The Liberal wants the control of the worker’s choice.  The Liberal wants control of the student’s choice.  The Liberal wants the control of Life choices.  It appears that they fear the person, the citizen, the individual to such an extreme that they are willing to throw away the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and every shred of personal choice.  They seek a monopoly on choice.

War on women?  War on Workers?  War on Teachers?  They must be laughing in that tent when the cameras are off.  The Liberal has a War on the Citizen’s Rights to Life, Liberty and Happiness.

No comments:

Post a Comment